Sure, the marketing says it's 500MHz but looking at the turbo boost and core scaling information, it looks as if they're almost identical for single core applications because of the 3.9GHz turbo boost on both CPUs. 8-core (standard configuration) Two 2.4GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon E5620 Westmere processors 12MB of fully shared 元 cache per processor Turbo Boost dynamic performance up to 2. As with the previous model, the RAM is expandable up to 16Gb. 8-core 41.2 pounds (18.7 kg) 1 Quad-core 39.9 pounds (18.1 kg) 1. It is available with 250, 500 or 750Gb of hard drive space and has a 16x SuperDrive. According to Apple, there are five different processors that the Mac Pro will use, all within Intels Xeon W chip family. 3 Apple M1 Chip 8-core CPU, 7-core GPU 8GB Memory 256GB SSD Space Gray. The 8-core runs at 3.0GHz but also has a turbo boost to 3.9GHz.Īs far as I can tell, there's very little difference between the 3.0GHz and 3.5GHz processors. The new addition to the Mac Pro line, the 8-Core runs dual 3.0Ghz processors with four cores per processor. 1GHz dual-core Core i3 processor, 8GB of RAM, and 256GB of storage. The 6-core runs at 3.5GHz with a turbo boost to 3.9GHz. While multiple cores are important for 3D and music work, I'm also interested in good old-fashioned clock speed for single/dual core apps like Dolphin and PC gaming. I'm trying to decided between the 8-core and 6-core model. I do music production as well as 3D rendering along with a little BootCamp gaming including the Dolphin (Wii) emulator. I'm just getting stuck at the CPU options. Go do some reading and you can make an informed decision.I'm going to buy a Mac Pro. These issues are all discussed in detail in previous threads. In my own case, I upgraded a dual 2.8 to a dual 3.0 and left well enough alone, but I have always been a nervous Nellie about the damage that excessive heat can do to components. We recommend these great replacements: Apple 27-inch iMac with Retina 5K display: 3.8GHz 8-core 10th-generation Intel Core i7 Apple Mac mini Apple M1 chip.
One person even reported lower temps after the install because the old thermal paste had been breaking down after 6 years.ĭepending on your own hardware setup, you may not be comfortable with the extra heat thrown off by the 3.2s. And there is no need to worry about finding special thermal paste either, as people who have successfully done the 3.2s used Arctic Silver or MX-4. The heat sinks are the same across the board.
That being said, there are folks who have installed dual 3.2 gHz CPUs without issues. The Mac Pro 'Eight Core' 2.26 (Early 2009/Nehalem) is powered by two 2.26 GHz Quad Core 45-nm Xeon E5520 (Nehalem) processors with a dedicated 256k of level 2 cache for each core and 8 MB of 'fully shared' level 3 cache per processor. TDP of the 3.2 is 130 whereas the TDP of the 2.8 or 3.0 is only 80. The 3.2 gHz CPUs are a potential issue because of heat, not power draw.
0 kommentar(er)
